Religion — at least Western religion — is forced to use a language which is double-edged. That is, it must represent the Transcendant in the most accessible of human terms as possible. And — ever since the 17th century, at least — religion’s terminology and constructs must not do violence to the older canons and/or newer discoveries of scientific investigation.
The Judeo-Christian scriptures have barely met the first of these goals, since most of the books of the Bible, from their beginning, were intended to speak to the uneducated as well as to the learned.
This near-success of the first demand, however, does not diminish any “modern” failure of religion to keep up-to-date with the latest findings of science — especially when you consider that even yesterday’s science itself wraps fish!
Let’s say the ground before us is strewn with multiple kinds of fruit — apples, peaches, pears, and such. Whereas religion would seek to describe all the “phenomena” on the ground before us, science tends to organize only the apples, only the peaches or only the pears, and then dismisses the remaining “phenomena” as being incredible because it is “un-apple-ific.”
Before modern science discovered its voice, and its methodology, we can believe the measurable universe was nevertheless always measurable. Time and curiosity and the evolution of ideas eventually revealed to the human mind this systematic way of organizing much of the reality around us. But, from the beginning, we were never promised that science would (or could) achieve an exhaustive taxonomy of all that is “real” within the universe of human experience.
The everyday reality which surrounds us leaves a lot more to be explained by science than does the somewhat limited number of apparent “inconsistencies” or “non sequiturs” in the Bible. Some of the ancient “mysteries” behind biblical religion, in fact, have already been explained by modern science — such as the primitive Jewish practice of circumcising an infant EIGHT days after its birth, instead of seven or nine days after (cf. S. I. Macmillan’s “None of These Diseases”).
Other mysteries of the Christian faith — such as the need or reality of a Trinity, or the need or reality of the Virgin Birth, or the need or reality of the Resurrection — have not yet been subsumed under all of science’s canonical discoveries.
Indeed, science would not be science if it teaches that the ultimate principles behind reality have already been discovered and are finally established.
[Copy Selction] [Translate With Google]